Analysis of Senate Bill 4621: The "No Tax on Tips Act"
I. Executive Summary
Senate Bill 4621, formally titled the "No Tax on Tips Act," proposes a significant amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill's central aim is to eliminate the application of federal income tax on cash tips received by individual taxpayers 1. This would be achieved through a deduction available to all individual taxpayers for the amount of cash tips they receive during a taxable year, provided these tips are reported to their employers in accordance with existing regulations 1. The intention behind this legislative effort is to provide financial relief to workers in occupations where tips constitute a significant portion of their income.
While the proposed legislation could offer a degree of financial benefit to a segment of the tipped workforce by increasing their after-tax income, concerns exist regarding the distribution of these benefits and the potential for unintended consequences. Specifically, the financial advantages of this bill are likely to be more pronounced for individuals who earn higher amounts in tips 2. This raises questions about whether the bill effectively targets those most in need of financial assistance within the tipped worker population. A significant concern also revolves around the potential for the bill to be misused. The prospect of tax-free tip income could incentivize individuals and businesses across various sectors to reclassify income as tips to reduce their tax obligations, potentially leading to widespread tax avoidance 2. It is also important to note that a substantial percentage of tipped workers currently have little to no federal income tax liability due to their income levels 2. For this group, the direct impact of eliminating income tax on tips would be minimal. Alternative policy approaches, such as increasing the minimum wage and phasing out the separate lower minimum wage for tipped workers, have been suggested as potentially more effective and equitable ways to support low-wage earners 2. In conclusion, while the "No Tax on Tips Act" seeks to address a perceived financial burden on tipped workers, its current structure presents considerable risks of abuse and may not be the most efficient or fair method for supporting this segment of the workforce.
II. Detailed Analysis of Senate Bill 4621
The primary mechanism of Senate Bill 4621 is the creation of a new deduction from gross income for the total amount of cash tips received by an individual taxpayer during a taxable year 1. This deduction is notable as it is structured as an "above-the-line" deduction, meaning it can be claimed by all eligible taxpayers, regardless of whether they choose to itemize their deductions or take the standard deduction 1. To qualify for this deduction, the cash tips received must be included on the statements furnished to the employer, as mandated by section 6053(a) of the Internal Revenue Code 1. This reporting requirement is already in place for tipped employees who receive $20 or more in tips in a calendar month 11.
In addition to establishing this deduction, the bill mandates that the Secretary of the Treasury must modify the existing procedures for income tax withholding to account for this new deduction 1. This suggests that the Treasury Department would need to develop guidance and potentially new forms to allow employers and employees to adjust their withholding to reflect the anticipated tax savings from the tip deduction. The proposed changes, if enacted, would apply to taxable years commencing after December 31, 2024 1. This timeline indicates that taxpayers would first be able to claim this deduction when filing their tax returns in early 2026 for the 2025 tax year.
While the bill explicitly refers to a deduction for "cash tips," the legislation itself does not provide a specific definition of this term 1. However, by referencing tips included on statements furnished to the employer under section 6053(a), it can be inferred that "cash tips" refer to tips received directly in cash by an employee and subsequently reported to their employer as required by law 1. It is important to note that the broader understanding of tips often includes those received electronically through credit cards, debit cards, or other digital payment methods 4. The bill's specific focus on cash tips might create a distinction in tax treatment between different forms of gratuities and could potentially influence how customers choose to tip.
Recent developments indicate that the latest version of the "No Tax on Tips Act" includes certain limitations aimed at addressing concerns about potential abuse. Specifically, reports suggest the inclusion of a $25,000 annual cap on the amount of the deduction, as well as occupational and total compensation limits 4. However, the detailed specifics of these occupational and total compensation limits are not readily available in the provided materials. These proposed guardrails represent an evolution from earlier versions of the bill, such as the 2024 iteration (S. 4621/H.R. 8941), which reportedly lacked such restrictions 4.
It is also worth noting that other related proposals exist regarding the taxation of tips. For instance, Representative Bacon's bill, the "Tip Tax Termination Act" (H.R. 558), proposes a different approach by establishing an exclusion from gross income for tipped wages up to $20,000 for a period of five years 4. This distinction between a deduction (as in S. 4621) and an exclusion (as in H.R. 558) can have different impacts on a taxpayer's adjusted gross income and ultimately their tax liability.
III. Who Benefits Most?
The most direct positive impact of the "No Tax on Tips Act" would be felt by tipped workers who currently have a federal income tax liability. By allowing a deduction for cash tips, the bill would effectively reduce their taxable income, leading to a decrease in the amount of federal income tax they owe and an increase in their net take-home pay.
To understand the potential scope of this impact, it is important to consider the size and income distribution of the tipped workforce in the United States. Estimates suggest that there are between 4 and 4.9 million individuals working in predominantly tipped occupations across the country 7. These occupations commonly include roles such as waiters and waitresses, bartenders, barbers, and hairdressers 7. While the bill aims to provide relief to these workers, data indicates that a significant portion of them may not directly benefit from an income tax deduction. For example, in 2022, approximately 37% of tipped workers had incomes low enough that they paid no federal income tax, even before accounting for tax credits 2. For these individuals, the elimination of income tax on tips would not result in any direct tax savings. Furthermore, the median weekly wage for tipped occupations in 2023 was $538, considerably lower than the $1,000 median for non-tipped workers 7. This suggests that many tipped workers operate within lower income brackets.
Among those tipped workers who do have a federal income tax liability, the magnitude of the benefit from the "No Tax on Tips Act" would likely be proportional to the amount of tips they earn. Individuals who receive higher amounts in tips would experience a larger absolute reduction in their tax bill compared to those with lower tip earnings 2. This implies that while the bill is framed as providing relief to tipped workers in general, the primary beneficiaries, in terms of the largest tax savings, would likely be those in higher-earning tipped positions.
It is also crucial to consider the potential interaction of this bill with other tax benefits aimed at low- and moderate-income individuals, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit (CTC). These credits are often based on a taxpayer's reported earned income. If a portion of a tipped worker's income shifts from taxable wages to non-taxable tips due to this deduction, their reported earned income could decrease 2. This reduction in reported income could potentially lower the amount of EITC or CTC that the worker is eligible to receive, thereby offsetting or even negating the financial benefit of the tip tax deduction in some cases 2. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of the bill's impact on low-income tipped workers requires considering these potential interactions with other parts of the tax code.
IV. Potential for Abuse and Loopholes
A significant concern surrounding the "No Tax on Tips Act" is the potential for its abuse and the creation of loopholes that could lead to widespread tax avoidance 2. If cash tips become exempt from federal income tax, a strong incentive would be created for individuals and businesses in various sectors to reclassify other forms of income, such as wages, salaries, or service charges, as tips 2. This could extend beyond traditional tipped industries like restaurants and hospitality to encompass a wide range of service-based professions, including retail, personal care services, and even potentially professional services where a "tip" could be framed as a gratuity for good service.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which is already facing challenges with underfunding and a significant tax gap (the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid), would likely face considerable difficulty in auditing and enforcing the proper classification of income under such a system 5. The subjective nature of what constitutes a "tip" could make it challenging for the IRS to distinguish legitimate tips from disguised wages or other forms of compensation, potentially leading to a substantial increase in tax evasion.
Notably, the initial versions of the "No Tax on Tips Act" reportedly lacked robust safeguards to prevent such abuse 4. The introduction of a $25,000 deduction cap, along with occupational and total compensation limits, in the latest version suggests a recognition of these concerns and an attempt to mitigate the risk of widespread misuse 4. However, the effectiveness of these limits in preventing abuse, particularly by higher-income earners who might have more sophisticated means of reclassifying income, remains to be seen. The specific details and thresholds of the occupational and total compensation limits would be critical in determining their efficacy.
Some have even suggested the possibility of treating tips as gifts under the tax code 6. However, this classification could lead to even greater potential for abuse, especially considering the annual gift tax exclusion amount (currently $18,000 per recipient in 2024) 6. If tips were treated as gifts, individuals could potentially receive substantial amounts of income labeled as tips without facing any federal income or payroll tax liability, further exacerbating the risk of tax avoidance.
Furthermore, the proposed legislation could influence the behavior of employers. With tips potentially becoming tax-free for employees, employers might be incentivized to lower base wages and shift a larger portion of employee compensation to tips, which are paid directly by customers 2. This could lead to more volatile and unpredictable income for workers, as tip amounts can fluctuate based on factors beyond their control, and might not necessarily result in an overall increase in their total compensation.
V. Broader Economic and Social Implications
The implementation of the "No Tax on Tips Act" could have significant broader economic and social implications. One of the most immediate concerns is the potential impact on federal and state tax revenues 2. If a substantial portion of income is reclassified as tax-free tips, the government could experience a considerable decrease in income tax revenue, potentially leading to budget deficits or the need to raise taxes elsewhere.
It is important to note that while the bill aims to eliminate federal income tax on tips, it does not propose to exempt tips from federal payroll taxes, which fund Social Security and Medicare 7. These taxes would still be levied on reported tip income. However, if the incentive for underreporting tips increases due to the elimination of income tax, this could indirectly impact the funding of these vital social programs.
The bill could also further shape the existing "tipping culture" in the United States 2. If tips become tax-free, there might be increased pressure on consumers to tip in a wider range of situations, even where tipping is not currently customary. This could lead to consumer fatigue or resentment and potentially exacerbate existing societal debates about the appropriateness and fairness of tipping as a primary form of compensation in certain industries.
A fundamental question of fairness arises when considering the "No Tax on Tips Act": why should tipped workers receive a tax break that is not available to other low-wage workers in non-tipped occupations 2? Individuals working as retail cashiers, home health aides, or in other service roles often earn similar or even lower incomes than some tipped workers but would not receive the same tax benefit under this proposal. This raises concerns about horizontal equity within the tax system.
Finally, if a larger portion of a worker's income becomes reliant on discretionary tips and is not subject to income tax, this could potentially have negative consequences for their eligibility for unemployment benefits, which are often based on reported wage income 5. Similarly, lenders often rely on reported taxable income when assessing an individual's creditworthiness for loans. A shift towards a greater proportion of untaxed tip income could complicate this process for some workers 5. While the provided research does not directly link this specific bill to unemployment benefits, it is a logical area to consider when analyzing the broader implications of such a change in tax policy.
VI. Alternative Approaches and Suggested Amendments
Given the potential drawbacks and risks associated with the "No Tax on Tips Act" in its current form, it is important to consider alternative approaches to improving the financial well-being of low-wage workers, including those who rely on tips. One widely discussed alternative is raising the federal minimum wage and phasing out the separate, lower minimum wage that currently applies to tipped workers 2. This approach would provide a more stable and predictable base income for workers, reducing their reliance on the variability of tips and potentially leading to greater economic security.
Another area for consideration is reforming the existing tip credit system, which allows employers to count a portion of an employee's tips towards their minimum wage obligation. Modifications to this system could ensure that tipped workers receive a fairer base wage in addition to their tips.
Expanding existing tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit (CTC) could also be a more targeted and effective way to provide financial support to low- and moderate-income working families, regardless of whether they are in tipped or non-tipped occupations 2. Strengthening these credits could provide broader benefits and avoid some of the potential inequities and risks associated with a blanket elimination of income tax on tips.
If policymakers decide to move forward with legislation aimed at reducing the tax burden on tips, several amendments to Senate Bill 4621 could be considered to mitigate its potential negative consequences:
Lower Deduction Cap: A significantly lower annual deduction cap than $25,000 could be implemented to ensure the benefits are more focused on lower- and middle-income tipped workers and to reduce the incentive for abuse by higher earners.
Clearer Definition of Eligible Occupations: While the bill calls for the Treasury to publish a list of qualified occupations 4, the legislation could provide more specific criteria for determining which occupations traditionally and customarily receive tips, thereby preventing the reclassification of income in non-traditional sectors.
Income Limitations: Stricter income limitations for eligibility for the deduction could be put in place to ensure that the primary beneficiaries are those in lower income brackets, aligning with the stated goal of providing relief to working families 21.
Stronger Enforcement Mechanisms: The bill could include provisions that would allocate additional resources to the IRS for oversight and enforcement to prevent and penalize the fraudulent misclassification of income as tips.
Sunset Provision: Incorporating a sunset provision would allow for a future review of the bill's effectiveness and impact after a set period, enabling Congress to make adjustments if unintended consequences arise.
Integration with Minimum Wage Policies: Amendments could be explored that would link the tax deduction to employers paying at least the full federal minimum wage (without relying on the tip credit), ensuring that workers receive a stable base income in addition to any tips they earn.
VII. Conclusion
Senate Bill 4621, the "No Tax on Tips Act," is a legislative proposal with the well-intentioned goal of providing financial relief to tipped workers by eliminating federal income tax on their cash tips. While this could lead to an increase in take-home pay for some individuals in tipped occupations, the analysis reveals several significant concerns. The benefits of the bill are likely to be disproportionately realized by higher-earning tipped workers, while a substantial portion of the tipped workforce with low incomes may see little to no direct impact. Furthermore, the potential for widespread abuse through the reclassification of income as tips poses a serious threat to the integrity of the tax system and could lead to significant revenue losses.
The proposed $25,000 deduction cap and other limitations represent an attempt to address these concerns, but their effectiveness in preventing abuse, particularly by those with the means to manipulate the system, remains uncertain. The bill also raises questions of fairness by providing a tax benefit to one segment of the low-wage workforce while excluding others in similar or worse financial situations.
Ultimately, while acknowledging the desire to support tipped workers, the "No Tax on Tips Act" in its current form presents considerable risks and may not be the most effective or equitable approach. Alternative policies, such as raising the minimum wage and strengthening existing tax credits for low-income families, offer potentially more direct and broader solutions. If policymakers choose to pursue tax relief for tipped workers, careful consideration of targeted amendments and robust enforcement mechanisms will be crucial to mitigate the unintended consequences and ensure that the benefits are directed to those who need them most, without creating new avenues for tax avoidance.
Works cited
1. Text - S.4621 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): No Tax on Tips Act ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4621/text
2. “No tax on tips” will harm more workers than it helps: Proposals in Congress and now 20 states could encourage harmful employer practices and lead to tip requests in virtually every consumer transaction | Economic Policy Institute, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.epi.org/blog/no-tax-on-tips-will-harm-more-workers-than-it-helps-proposals-in-congress-and-now-20-states-could-encourage-harmful-employer-practices-and-lead-to-tip-requests-in-virtually-every-co/
3. RELEASE: Sen. Ted Cruz's No Tax on Tips Act Does Little for Low ..., accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release-sen-ted-cruzs-no-tax-on-tips-act-does-little-for-low-and-moderate-wage-workers-but-opens-door-to-tax-abuse-by-wealthy/
4. Trump Renews Call for Tax-Free Tips - Thomson Reuters tax, accessed March 15, 2025, https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/news/trump-renews-call-for-tax-free-tips/
5. 'No Tax on Tips' Proposals 101 | University of Nevada, Las Vegas, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.unlv.edu/news/article/no-tax-tips-proposals-101
6. No Tax on Tips: Pragmatic Tax Proposal or Populist Tax Policy Nightmare?, accessed March 15, 2025, https://frblaw.com/no-tax-on-tips-pragmatic-tax-proposal-or-populist-tax-policy-nightmare/
7. The “No Tax on Tips Act”: Background on Tipped Workers | The Budget Lab at Yale, accessed March 15, 2025, https://budgetlab.yale.edu/news/240624/no-tax-tips-act-background-tipped-workers
8. S.4621 - No Tax on Tips Act 118th Congress (2023-2024), accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4621
9. Momentum Builds for Tax-free Tips - Poole College of Management, accessed March 15, 2025, https://poole.ncsu.edu/thought-leadership/article/momentum-builds-for-tax-free-tips/
10. Bill tracking in US - S 4621 (118 legislative session) - FastDemocracy, accessed March 15, 2025, https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/us/118/bills/USB00085942/
11. Reporting Taxes on Tip Income | H&R Block, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/income/wages/reporting-tip-income/
12. Tip Income: What It is, How It Works, Taxability - Investopedia, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tipincome.asp
13. Are Tips Taxable? - TurboTax Tax Tips & Videos - Intuit, accessed March 15, 2025, https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tips/jobs-and-career/how-to-claim-tips-on-your-tax-return/L2xnHeQvl
14. Hearing Recap: Tipped Workers Edition, accessed March 15, 2025, https://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=411942
15. edworkforce.house.gov, accessed March 15, 2025, https://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=411942#:~:text=He%20stated%2C%20%E2%80%9CThere%20are%20over,they%20prefer%20the%20current%20system.%E2%80%9D
16. Overview of the Tipped Minimum Wage - National Employment Law Project, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.nelp.org/insights-research/minimum-wage-basics-overview-tipped-minimum-wage/
17. One Fair Wage: Women Fare Better in States with Equal Treatment for Tipped Workers, accessed March 15, 2025, https://nwlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Tipped-Workers-FS-2024.6.12v1.pdf
18. No tax on tips: An answer in search of a question - Brookings Institution, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/no-tax-on-tips-an-answer-in-search-of-a-question/
19. Horsford announces bill to make sure high-end earners can't exploit an end to tax on tips, accessed March 15, 2025, https://horsford.house.gov/media/in-the-news/horsford-announces-bill-to-make-sure-high-end-earners-can-t-exploit-an-end-to-tax-on-tips
20. Experts Explain Why 'No Taxes on Tips' Is Not What Tipped Workers Need, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.commondreams.org/news/no-tax-on-tips
21. ICYMI: Rosen Helps Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Exempt Tips from Federal Income Tax, accessed March 15, 2025, https://www.rosen.senate.gov/2025/01/21/icymi-rosen-helps-introduce-bipartisan-bill-to-exempt-tips-from-federal-income-tax/